MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024069869 · doi:10.1063/1.3514896

Tunnel coupled dangling bond structures on hydrogen terminated silicon surfaces

2011· article· en· W2024069869 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason Pitters, Lucian Livadaru, Muhammad Haider, Robert A. Wolkow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaNational Institute for Nanotechnology
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsDangling bondQuantum tunnellingSiliconCharge (physics)Materials scienceScanning tunneling microscopeCoupling (piping)Condensed matter physicsHydrogen bondChemical physicsCoulombMolecular physicsNanotechnologyChemistryMoleculePhysicsOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study both experimentally and theoretically the electronic behavior of dangling bonds (DBs) at a hydrogen terminated Si(100)-2×1 surface. Dangling bonds behave as quantum dots and, depending on their separation, can be tunnel coupled with each other or completely isolated. On n-type highly doped silicon, the latter have a net charge of -1e, while coupled DBs exhibit altered but predictable filling behavior derived from an interplay between interdot tunneling and Coulomb repulsion. We found good correlation between many scanning tunneling micrographs of dangling bond structures and our theoretical results of a corresponding extended Hubbard model. We also demonstrated chemical methods to prevent tunnel coupling and isolate charge on a single dangling bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207