Phenylsilane dehydrocoupling and addition to styrene catalyzed by (R-indenyl)Ni(phosphine)(methyl) complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report describes the synthesis and characterization of the Ni–Me complexes (R-indenyl)Ni(PR′3)Me (R = 1-i-Pr, 1-SiMe3, and 1,3-(SiMe3)2; R′= Me, Ph) and outlines their catalytic reactivities in the dehydrogenative oligomerization of PhSiH3 and its addition to styrene in the absence of initiators/activators. Observation of higher hydrosilylation activities for PPh3-based compounds featuring bulky substituents on the indenyl ligand confirms earlier suggestions that phosphine dissociation is an important component of the catalytic cycle for this reaction. In contrast, oligomerization of PhSiH3 is more facile with PMe3-based precursors and independent of the steric bulk of the indenyl ligand, implying that this reaction does not involve phosphine dissociation. These conclusions are consistent with the variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of {1,3,-(SiMe3)2-indenyl}Ni(PR′3)Me and various structural parameters observed in the solid-state structures of {1,3,-(SiMe3)2-indenyl}Ni(PPh3)Me, {1,3,-(SiMe3)2-indenyl}Ni(PMe3)Cl, and {1-SiMe3-indenyl}Ni(PMe3)Me.Key words: nickel-indenyl complexes, hydrosilylation, hydrosilane oligomerization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".