MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024125332 · doi:10.1063/1.1922572

Scanning tunneling microscopy characterization of low-profile crystalline TiSi2 microelectrodes on a Si(111) surface

2005· article· en· W2024125332 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Tong, Robert A. Wolkow

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScanning tunneling microscopeMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)SiliconEpitaxyElectrodeSilicideSubstrate (aquarium)Chemical vapor depositionThermal stabilityOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryLayer (electronics)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microscopic four-probe TiSi2 electrodes were fabricated on clean Si(111) surfaces and characterized using scanning tunneling microscopy with atomic resolution. The TiSi2 electrodes remained intact, and the clean Si(111)-7×7 structure was observed near the electrodes after annealing the Si substrate up to 1200 °C. The TiSi2 electrodes were formed with a high density of large silicide plateaus. Each plateau was formed from stacked atomically flat layers comprised of atomic rows, which have been assigned as C54 phase with an epitaxial relation of TiSi2(311)‖Si(111). The TiSi2 probes have the desired properties of very low profiles, low resistance, and thermal as well as chemical stability, thereby enabling the direct measurement of electrical transport properties of low-dimensional structures fabricated on clean Si surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207