A Comparison Between End-of-Life Home Care Clients With Cancer and Heart Failure in Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with heart failure experience complex symptoms and have a poor prognosis, comparable to those with cancer. However, people with heart failure are less likely to be recognized as needing palliative care. We compared seriously ill home care clients with cancer versus those with heart failure to explore differences between them using existing data from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC). The sample included 1,475 older adults (65+) in Ontario who had a prognosis of less than 6 months or severe health instability. Clients with heart failure were significantly older (p < .0001) and experienced significantly higher rates of impairment in activities of daily living (p = .005), cognitive impairment (p < .0001), and severe health instability (p < .0001), but were significantly less likely to have a prognosis of less than 6 months (p < .0001). Home care clients with heart failure have needs similar to those with cancer yet are typically not identified as having a terminal prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".