MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024139382 · doi:10.1117/12.842038

Monte Carlo modeling for photoacoustic-based transport-regime optical property estimation

2010· article· en· W2024139382 on OpenAlexafffund
Janaka C. Ranasinghesagara, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersTerry Fox FoundationUniversity of AlbertaNational Cancer InstituteMinistry of Advanced Education, Government of Alberta
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodOpticsScatteringLight scatteringSIGNAL (programming language)Imaging phantomPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicinePhotoacoustic effectMaterials scienceReflection (computer programming)LaserAmplitudeTransducerPhysicsAcousticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We developed a unique reflection-mode photoacoustic technique sensitive to optical scattering in turbid media. We focused a small laser spot on to the surface of a turbid medium and captured the photoacoustic signal by a focused ultrasound transducer. The amplitude of the photoacoustic signal for different surface illumination spot locations is an effective estimate of the Green's function of light transport in turbid media. Our results for different concentrations of Intralipid indicate that this method is capable of distinguishing small changes in the reduced scattering coefficient. In this work, we present experimental measurements for an Intralipid phantom with reduced scattering coefficients of 3, 4, and 5 cm-1, and show that Monte Carlo simulations of light transport accurately reproduce experimental curves. This means that we can estimate transport-regime optical properties of the media given a suitable fitting algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207