Quantum transport in alkane molecular wires: Effects of binding modes and anchoring groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of binding modes and anchoring groups on nonequilibrium electronic transport properties of alkane molecular wires are investigated from atomic first-principles based on density functional theory and nonequilibrium Green's function formalism. Four typical binding modes, top, bridge, hcp-hollow, and fcc-hollow, are considered at one of the two contacts. For wires with three different anchoring groups, dithiol, diamine, or dicarboxylic acid, the low bias conductances resulting from the four binding modes are all found to have either a high or a low value, well consistent with recent experimental observations. The trend can be rationalized by the behavior of electrode-induced gap states at small bias. When bias increases to higher values, states from the anchoring groups enter into the bias window and contribute significantly to the tunneling process so that transport properties become more complicated for the four binding modes. Other low bias behaviors including the values of the inverse length scale for tunneling characteristic, contact resistance, and the ratios of the high/low conductance values are also calculated and compared to experimental results. The conducting capabilities of the three anchoring groups are found to decrease from dithiol, diamine to dicarboxylic-acid, largely owing to a decrease in binding strength to the electrodes. Our results give a clear microscopic picture to the transport physics and provide reasonable qualitative explanations for the corresponding experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".