MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024169977 · doi:10.1364/bgpp.2007.btue2

Ultra-Narrow Bragg Grating for Active Semiconductor Laser Linewidth Reduction through Electrical Feedback

2007· article· en· W2024169977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBragg Gratings, Photosensitivity, and Poling in Glass Waveguides · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsTeraXion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser linewidthMaterials scienceOpticsSemiconductor laser theoryLaserDistributed feedback laserOptoelectronicsDiscriminatorFiber Bragg gratingGratingSemiconductorBragg's lawPhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A π-phase shifted Bragg grating is used as a frequency discriminator to reduce the frequency and phase noise of a semiconductor laser, and therefore its linewidth, using an electrical feedback loop on its injection current. The spectral notch at the center of the reflection peak of the grating was found to be 15 MHz FHWM, allowing for a laser linewidth reduction to 2 kHz over measurement times of 1 ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it