MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024216396 · doi:10.1017/s1743921307002256

Three-dimensional MHD simulations of magnetized molecular cloud fragmentation with turbulence and ion-neutral friction

2006· article· en· W2024216396 on OpenAlexaff
Takahiro Kudoh, Shantanu Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan
KeywordsMagnetohydrodynamicsMagnetic fieldPhysicsTurbulenceSupersonic speedAmbipolar diffusionIsothermal processMechanicsIonShock (circulatory)DiffusionMolecular cloudShock wavePlasmaComputational physicsAstrophysicsThermodynamicsStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We perform a 3D-MHD simulation of a self-gravitating isothermal gas layer that is initially penetrated by a uniform magnetic field. The strength of the initial magnetic field is such that the cloud is slightly subcritical. In this system, we input random supersonic turbulence initially. Ion-neutral friction is also introduced in the magnetized gas so that the magnetic diffusion allows gas to go across the magnetic field and form self-gravitating cores. We found that self-gravitating cores are formed in the dense region enhanced by the shock waves if ion-neutral friction is introduced. The time scale of core formation is on the order of the 106 years, which is faster than the usual magnetic diffusion time (107 years) estimated from the initial condition. Our result is consistent with the results of 2D-MHD simulations by Li & Nakamura (2004).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207