MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024220340 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6901160

Design and implementation of a rule-based learning algorithm using Zigbee wireless sensors for energy management

2014· article· en· W2024220340 on OpenAlexaff
Azim Keshtkar, Siamak Arzanpour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermostatWirelessWireless sensor networkComputer scienceEnergy consumptionElectricityEnergy managementMicrocontrollerEnergy conservationEnergy (signal processing)Embedded systemEfficient energy useReal-time computingAlgorithmEngineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capabilities of wireless sensors networks (WSNs) to measure different variables, could significantly improve the limitations of the existing energy management systems. In this paper, we introduce a combination of rule-based techniques and wireless sensors to demonstrate the capabilities of wireless sensors in reducing the electricity consumption without sacrificing thermal comfort that would help utilities in peak load curtailments. The method is applied to existing programmable thermostats (PTs) to add more intelligence to this device for better energy management in residential buildings. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed rule-based wireless thermostat performs better than the PTs in various aspects, i.e., learning, electric energy conservation, and occupant comfort that could help utilities in peak load curtailment. Moreover, our method is implemented on a typical residential Air Conditioner (AC) by using of X-bee wireless sensor and Arduino Microcontroller. Conducted results show that the combination of WSNs capabilities and the rule-based method reduce the energy consumption by 33.5% compared to the similar existing AC system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207