MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024222604 · doi:10.1159/000137368

Effect of Gamma Radiation on the Molecular Weight and the Anticoagulant Activity of Heparin

2008· article· en· W2024222604 on OpenAlexaff
A. S. Chawla, Cathy Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeparinAnticoagulantChemistryPharmacologyLow molecular weight heparinInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4 g% aqueous solutions of heparin were irradiated with the gamma radiation doses of 4.6 x 10(5) or 9.2 x 10(5) rads. The irradiated and also the non-irradiated heparin samples were fractionated using a Sephadex G-200 column. With radiation, the peak of the molecular weight distribution curves shifted toward the lower molecular weight. Also, the number average molecular weight decreased by 8.2 and 11.5% with the doses of 4.6 x 10(5) and 9.2 x 10(5) rads, respectively. The anticoagulant activity depended on the molecular weight of the heparin fractions. For the heparin fractions with molecular weights below 7,900, the anticoagulant activity decreased with radiation. Thus, for a heparin fraction with a molecular weight of 6,200, the anticoagulant activity decreased from 211 to 198 IU/mg after 4 h of irradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207