MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024227719 · doi:10.12968/pnur.2000.11.14.32

Choosing an Internet service provider

2000· article· en· W2024227719 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePractice Nursing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetInternet applianceTelephone lineService (business)Internet accessService providerTelecommunicationsInternet service providerInternet privacyLine (geometry)Internet transitBusinessWorld Wide WebTelephone networkComputer scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For most people, a telephone line (dial-up) connection is the only economic way of connecting their computer to the Internet from home. Most homes already have a telephone line installed, and you can buy a modem for under £100 (if your PC wasn't supplied with one). This is all the hardware you need to connect to the Internet, but you also need an internet service provider (ISP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePractice NursingSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207