MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024255269 · doi:10.1063/1.3605662

Comment on “Discussion on a mechanical equilibrium condition of a sessile drop on a smooth solid surface” [J. Chem. Phys. 130, 144106 (2009)]

2011· letter· en· W2024255269 on OpenAlexaff
Hadi Ghasemi, C. A. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSessile drop techniqueCurvatureContact angleAdsorptionSolid surfacePhase (matter)ThermodynamicsSurface (topology)Line (geometry)MechanicsDrop (telecommunication)ChemistryPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsPhysical chemistryChemical physicsGeometryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two articles have recently appeared that question the validity of the Young equation. The authors propose to add a new term, but their derivation is based on two mathematical errors, and they neglect gravity, mass transport at the interface and adsorption effects. Thus, the model they propose cannot account for the experimentally observed dependence of a sessile-droplet-contact angle on three-phase line curvature and on the pressure in the liquid phase at the three-phase line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207