Synthesis, Structure, and Magnetism of Bimetallic Manganese or Nickel Complexes of a Bridging Verdazyl Radical
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two binuclear metal-radical complexes, formed by the reaction of M(hfac)(2) x 2H(2)O (M = Mn or Ni; hfac = hexafluoroacetylacetonate) with the 1,5-dimethyl-3-(4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl)-6-oxoverdazyl radical (3), were synthesized. The binuclear Mn complex 5 (i.e., 3[Mn(hfac)(2)](2)) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c: C(30)H(17)N(6)O(9)F(24)Mn(2), a = 29.947(3), b = 17.143(3), c = 16.276(3) A, beta = 123.748(3)*, Z = 4. The compound consists of two pseudo-octahedral Mn(II) ions, both bearing two hfac ancillary ligands, bridged by the bis(bidentate) radical 3. The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of 5 reveals moderate antiferromagnetic exchange between each of the Mn(II) ions and the verdazyl radical (J = -48 cm(-1)). The S = 9/2 ground spin state of the complex was corroborated by low-temperature magnetization versus field measurements. In contrast, the magnetic susceptibility versus temperature behavior of 6 (whose molecular structure is presumed to be analogous to that of 5) indicates that the two Ni(II) ions are strongly ferromagnetically coupled to the verdazyl radical (J = +220 cm(-1)). The magnetization versus field behavior of 5 is consistent with an S = 5/2 ground-state species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it