MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024309298 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m008810200

Insights into Ligand Binding and Catalysis of a Central Step in NAD+ Synthesis

2001· article· en· W2024309298 on OpenAlexaff
V. Saridakis, Dinesh Christendat, Matthew S. Kimber, Akil Dharamsi, A.M. Edwards, E.F. Pai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesOffice of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNAD+ kinaseLigand (biochemistry)ChemistryCatalysisCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryBiochemistryEnzymeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNATase) catalyzes the linking of NMN(+) or NaMN(+) with ATP, which in all organisms is one of the common step in the synthesis of the ubiquitous coenzyme NAD(+), via both de novo and salvage biosynthetic pathways. The structure of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum NMNATase determined using multiwavelength anomalous dispersion phasing revealed a nucleotide-binding fold common to nucleotidyltransferase proteins. An NAD(+) molecule and a sulfate ion were bound in the active site allowing the identification of residues involved in product binding. In addition, the role of the conserved (16)HXGH(19) active site motif in catalysis was probed by mutagenic, enzymatic and crystallographic techniques, including the characterization of an NMN(+)/SO4(2-) complex of mutant H19A NMNATase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207