The role of calcium on protein secretion of the albumen gland in<i>Helisoma duryi</i>(Gastropoda)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The albumen gland of the freshwater pulmonate snail Helisoma duryi produces and secretes the perivitelline fluid, which coats fertilized eggs and provides nutrients to the developing embryos. It is known that perivitelline fluid secretion is stimulated by dopamine through the activation of a dopamine D 1 ‐like receptor, which in turn stimulates cAMP production leading to the secretion of perivitelline fluid. This paper examines the glandular release of perivitelline fluid and provides evidence for the role of Ca 2+ in the regulated secretion of perivitelline fluid based on protein secretion experiments and inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate assays. Dopamine‐stimulated protein secretion by the albumen gland is reduced in Ca 2+ ‐free medium or in the presence of plasma membrane Ca 2+ channel blockers, although the Ca 2+ channel subtype involved is unclear. In addition, dopamine‐stimulated protein secretion does not directly involve phospholipase C‐generated signaling pathways and Ca 2+ release from intracellular stores. Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ ‐ATPase inhibitors had little effect on protein secretion when applied alone; however, they potentiated dopamine‐stimulated protein secretion. Dantrolene, an inhibitor of ryanodine receptors, 8‐(N,N‐diethylamino)‐octyl‐3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzoate hydrochloride, a nonspecific inhibitor of intracellular Ca 2+ channels, and 2‐aminoethyldiphenylborate, an inhibitor of inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptors, did not suppress protein secretion, suggesting Ca 2+ release from internal stores does not directly regulate protein secretion. Thus, the influx of Ca 2+ from the extracellular space appears to be the major pathway mediating protein secretion by the albumen gland. The results are discussed with respect to the role of Ca 2+ in controlling exocytosis of proteins from the albumen gland secretory cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".