MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The correlation between epidermal growth factor levels in saliva and the severity of oral mucositis during oropharyngeal radiation therapy

2000· article· en· W2024381955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia HospitalVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucositisMedicineSalivaErythemaRadiation therapyInternal medicineOral mucosaGastroenterologyEpidermal growth factorHead and neck cancerStomatitisCancerSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is present in biologic fluids, including saliva, and plays a role in maintenance of the epithelial barrier and in healing of damaged mucosa. The purpose of this study was to assess the relation between salivary EGF and the severity of oral mucositis in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck during radiation therapy. METHODS: Whole resting saliva (WRS) and whole stimulated saliva (WSS) were collected prior to radiation and each week during radiation treatment for 11 men and 7 women. Oral mucositis was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) scale of 0-4 and the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), which evaluates the extent of erythema (scale of 0-2) and ulcerations (scale of 0-3) in nine oral sites. The overall OMAS score of 0-45 reflected the mucosal condition. EGF was assayed in the saliva specimens. RESULTS: The total mean radiation dose delivered to the head and neck was 5667 centigrays (cGy) in a mean of 24 fractions. Ulcerative oral mucositis occurred in 94% of patients. The mean OMAS score ranged from 2.83 in the first week of treatment to 14.77 in the fifth week. The mean WRS and WSS volumes decreased significantly from pretreatment to the first week of radiation treatment and then remained stable. A similar pattern was seen for the mean total output of EGF. A significant and negative correlation was found between higher levels of EGF in stimulated saliva and low OMAS score, reflecting less severe erythema and ulceration. A general trend showing that less tissue damage was associated with a higher EGF level in resting saliva also was illustrated. EGF levels were correlated with the OMAS score; however, no correlation was found when assessing the NCI score, which combines tissue damage with function and symptoms in a single score. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced mucositis appeared to be modified by saliva volume, total EGF, and concentration of EGF in the oral environment. Saliva volume and total EGF output decreased significantly in the first weeks of treatment and remained reduced throughout radiation therapy. The findings suggest that higher levels of EGF in saliva, particularly in stimulated saliva, prior to and during radiation treatment may be associated with less severe mucosal damage due to radiation therapy. It is also postulated that human EGF may affect the development and healing of radiation-damaged mucosa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it