MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024395317 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01035.2001

Ca<sup>2+</sup>oscillations, gradients, and homeostasis in vascular smooth muscle

2002· review· en· W2024395317 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng‐Han Lee, Damon Poburko, Kuo‐Hsing Kuo, Chun Y. Seow, Cornelis van Breemen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumCytoplasmBiophysicsVascular smooth muscleChemistryHomeostasisContraction (grammar)Calcium signalingStimulationCell biologyBiologySmooth muscleSignal transductionBiochemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vascular smooth muscle shows both plasticity and heterogeneity with respect to Ca(2+) signaling. Physiological perturbations in cytoplasmic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) may take the form of a uniform maintained rise, a transient uniform [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, a transient localized rise in [Ca(2+)](i) (also known as spark and puff), a transient propagated wave of localized [Ca(2+)](i) elevation (Ca(2+) wave), recurring asynchronous Ca(2+) waves, or recurring synchronized Ca(2+) waves dependent on the type of blood vessel and the nature of stimulation. In this overview, evidence is presented which demonstrates that interactions of ion transporters located in the membranes of the cell, sarcoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria form the basis of this plasticity of Ca(2+) signaling. We focus in particular on how the junctional complexes of plasmalemma and superficial sarcoplasmic reticulum, through the generation of local cytoplasmic Ca(2+) gradients, maintain [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations, couple these to either contraction or relaxation, and promote Ca(2+) cycling during homeostasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207