MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024404156 · doi:10.1080/09603100600735310

Fractional integration in the equity markets of MENA region

2007· article· en· W2024404156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Financial Economics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsVolatility (finance)StatisticEquity (law)Emerging marketsRescaled rangeStock marketSpurious relationshipFinancial economicsLong memoryEconometricsStock (firearms)MathematicsStatisticsGeographyMacroeconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major issue in financial economics is the behaviour of stock market returns over long horizons. This article provides an empirical investigation of the long-range dependence in the emerging stock markets of Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Turkey. We use the modified rescaled range statistic (R/S) proposed by Lo (1991 Lo, AW. 1991. Long-term memory in stock market prices. Econometrica, 59: 1279–313. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the rescaled variance statistic (V/S) developed by Giraitis et al . (2003 Giraitis, L, Kokoszka, PS, Leipus, R and Teyssiere, G. 2003. Rescaled variance and related tests for long memory in volatility and levels. Journal of Econometrics, 112: 265–94. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to investigate the long memory in the returns and volatility. Significant long memory is demonstrated in the series and implies a fractal market structure in the Middle East and North African (MENA) equity markets. We further investigate whether the long memory is caused by a shift in variance. Interestingly, our findings indicate that the presence of long memory in volatility due to shifts in variance cannot be confirmed for these markets and are consistent with those results obtained by Lobato and Savin (1998 Lobato, IN and Savin, NE. 1998. Real and spurious long memory properties of stock-market data. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 16: 261–8. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) on other markets. Thus, our results should be useful to regulators, practitioners and derivative market participants in the MENA region, whose success depends on the ability to forecast stock price movements over long horizons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it