MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024483262 · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6290

Dynamics of nitrogen retention in entire male pigs immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone1

2013· article· en· W2024483262 on OpenAlexaff
L. Huber, E. James Squires, C. F. M. de Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceInternal medicineEndocrinologyBOARMealChemistryBiologyMedicineAndrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immunization against GnRH reduces the occurrence of boar-taint-causing compounds in entire male pigs and is likely to alter growth performance, including whole-body protein deposition (PD; N retention × 6.25). Thirty-six male pigs were used to determine the effects of immunization against GnRH with GnRH analog on N retention and plasma urea nitrogen (PUN; a measure of AA catabolism). Four treatments were used: 1) conventional, early castrates (EC), 2) entire male pigs (EM), 3) entire male pigs immunized with GnRH analog (IM), and 4) entire male pigs surgically castrated after 6 wk of age (between 25 and 40 kg BW; late castrates; LC). The GnRH analog was injected at 30 and 70 kg BW. Within each of 9 litters, 4 males were randomly assigned to the 4 treatments. Pigs were fed corn- and soybean-meal-based diets that were not limiting in essential nutrients for high PD. Five consecutive N balances were conducted between d -9 and -4, 1 and 7, 9 and 16, 20 and 26, and 30 and 36, relative to administration of the booster dose of GnRH analog at d 0. Blood was sampled on d -4, -1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 19, 28, and 37. There was an interactive effect of treatment and time on N retention (P < 0.001). Across periods, N retention for EC and LC were similar (32.7 vs. 33.6 g/d) and lower than EM (39.2 g/d, P < 0.001). The N retention in EM and IM were similar up to d 7 (37.8 vs. 38.5 g/d), tended to be greater for EM than IM between d 9 and 16 (38.4 vs. 34.9 g/d, P = 0.07) and was greater for EM than IM after d 20 (40.9 vs. 34.9 g/d, P < 0.05). Between d 9 and 36, N retention in IM was similar to EC and LC. The PUN concentrations were similar in EC and LC across sampling times (15.50 vs. 15.86 mg/dL) and greater than EM (9.33 mg/dL, P < 0.05). The PUN concentrations were similar in EM and IM up to d 5 (9.88 vs. 9.59 mg/dL), tended to be less in EM than IM on d 8 (9.08 vs. 11.85 mg/dL, P < 0.10), and were lower in EM than IM from d 11 to 37 (8.94 vs. 14.80 mg/dL, P < 0.05). After d 8, PUN concentrations were similar for IM, EC, and LC (14.31, 15.13, and 15.55 mg/dL, respectively). In conclusion, the results of the current study show that N retention and PUN patterns in EC and LC are very similar and lower than those in EM. Between d 7 and 16 after administration of the booster dose of GnRH analog, N retention and PUN in IM changed gradually from EM levels to approach levels in EC and LC, which should be considered when developing feeding programs for IM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207