MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024486592 · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.155422

Prazosin: a potential new management tool for iatrogenic autonomic dysreflexia in individuals with spinal cord injury?

2015· article· en· W2024486592 on OpenAlexaffabout
AaronA Phillips, MeiM.Z. Zheng, StacyL Elliott, AndreiV Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Regeneration Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomic dysreflexiaMedicineSpinal cord injuryNifedipineAnesthesiaGabapentinPrazosinPopulationBlood pressureInternal medicineSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that not only results in a loss of motor functions but also severe autonomic dysfunctions (Krassioukov and Claydon, 2006). Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a life threatening episode of transient hypertension that occurs up to 30x/day (11x/day on average) in those with cervical or high thoracic SCI (Hubli et al., 2015). Most common triggers of AD are from stimuli such as a full bowel and/or bladder, or sexual arousal (Teasell et al., 2000). Penile vibrostimulation (PVS) is a clinical procedure for sperm retrieval used for the purpose of family planning or fertility assessment that unfortunately iatrogenically induces episodes of AD (Elliott, 2006). Recently, we published a clinical trial highlighting that prazosin may be a viable option for treating AD secondary to PVS (Phillips et al., 2014). Currently, the most commonly used medication to mitigate the severity of AD episodes during PVS is nifedipine (Adalat), an immediate-release calcium channel blocker (Krassioukov et al., 2009). However, individuals with SCI experience persistently low resting blood pressure (BP) as well as orthostatic hypotension (Krassioukov and Claydon, 2006). While nifedipine is effective at significantly reducing the severity of BP increases secondary to AD, it unfortunately has the tendency tolower resting BP for up to 5 hours. Also, SCI patients with persistent hypotension may experience dizziness, fatigue, and weakness after being administered nifedipine (Krassioukov et al., 2009). Together, these factors contribute to the need to explore alternative therapies for mitigating AD severity in the SCI population. Nifedipine lowers BP by blocking both the renin-angiotension (RAS) pathway and the α-adrenergic receptors. Prazosin (Minipress), on the other hand, is a selective α-adrenergic blocker that preserves the vasoactive actions of the RAS pathways (Jaillon, 1980; Krassioukov and Claydon, 2006). Consequently, prazosin exudes a less abrupt suppressive effect on resting BP (Jaillon, 1980). A previous clinical study suggests that prazosin may be a feasible prophylactic treatment of AD, as it has shown a reduced incidence and severity of AD episodes in hospitalized SCI patients due to urogenic complications or other causes (Krum et al., 1992). We recently conducted a clinical trial to examine the efficacy of prazosin at reducing AD severity in SCI outpatients undergoing PVS who regularly experienced severe iatrogenically-induced episodes of AD. Six patients with complete chronic SCI (> 2 years) were tested in a placebo controlled trial using a 1 mg tablet of prazosin at home the night before testing (loading dose), followed by a second 1 mg tablet 2 hours prior to the PVS procedure. Participants acted as their own controls. Hemodynamic assessments took place for 10 minutes prior to and during the procedure. The resting BP was calculated from minutes 3–8 of the 10 minute recording before the procedure, after both doses of prazosin were administered. All six participants experienced AD episodes following ejaculation from PVS after taking either placebo or prazosin. We noted two major findings: 1) patients experienced a significantly smaller increase in SBP after ejaculation after being administered prazosin compared to placebo (97 ± 34 mmHg vs. 141 ± 46 mmHg, P = 0.02), 2) no difference in resting BP between prazosin and placebo trials (Figure 1). The results suggest that like nifedipine, prazosin is effective at reducing the severity of iatrogenically-induced AD due to PVS. However, prazosin did not result in a decrease in resting BP, suggesting it may be a viable alternative for mitigating AD severity, with particular benefit in patients suffering from persistent hypotension.Figure 1: Comparing systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline (figure on left) to development of autonomic dysreflexia during ejaculation with penile vibrostimulation (figure on right), after either placebo or prazosin was administered.The increase in SBP was mitigated during ejaculation when prazosin was administered compared to placebo (*P = 0.02), as shown with two-way repeated measures ANOVA; however, resting blood pressure was not different between the two trials.One critical consideration when administering prazosin to manage AD symptoms in SCI is the risk of eliciting what is referred to as a “first-dose phenomenon”; where patients experience a severe drop in BP the first time it is administered (Graham et al., 1976). It is recommended that if administering as prophylactic, the first dose (i.e., “loading dose”) should be ingested before night-time sleep (when patient is in supine position) to mitigate the risk of severe orthostatic hypotension. This phenomenon does not occur on subsequent days of administration. Larger clinical trials should be conducted in the future, using more sophisticated BP measurements (i.e., 15 minute interval 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring), to further establish the use of prazosin as a prophylactic management of AD. This would allow for more powerful and generalizable results. In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that 1 mg prazosin (administered orally once the night before, and once 2 hours prior to ejaculation) is effective at reducing the severity of iatrogenically-induced AD in those with SCI during PVS. Importantly, low resting BP was not exacerbated by prazosin in SCI patients. AAP is supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. AVK is supported by the Paralyzed Veterans of America, the Craig Neilson Foundation, the Canadian Institute of Health Research, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. We would like to thank the editors of Neural Regeneration Research for their invitation to editorialize our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Regeneration ResearchSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207