Human Resource Strategies as a Mediator between Leadership and Organizational Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leadership style is a kind of method that aims to realize organizational targets and affect all organizational activities. This quantitative study focused on various business domains in Saudi Arabia to examine how leadership styles are related to human resource strategies and organizational performance. The study adopted the self-administered survey methodology technique using a pre-validated pre-piloted questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling. A total of 270 questionnaires were distributed with a response rate 92.9% based on a convenience method. Our survey found a direct positive relationship between leadership style and organizational performance and an indirect relationship between leadership style and human resource strategy as a mediator, while human resource strategies contribute positively and significantly to organizational performance. The findings are relevant for operating human resource management strategies and for developing a style of leadership. An enterprise can use this information to promote recognition and devotion among its employees based on a range of strategies, and then creates overall performance of the organization. Also, it is possible to use different leadership styles for different strategies. Consequently, this study has both theoretical and practical reference value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".