MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024534679 · doi:10.2118/140519-ms

Life-Cycle Decline Curve Estimation for Tight/Shale Reservoirs

2011· article· en· W2024534679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight gasHydraulic fracturingPetroleum engineeringTight oilDirectional drillingPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil shaleGeologyUnconventional oilReservoir simulationFracture (geology)DrillingFlow (mathematics)Completion (oil and gas wells)Geotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low-permeability (tight) and shale (gas and oil) reservoirs have emerged as a significant source of energy in North America. Recent advances in technology, such as long horizontal lateral/multi-lateral drilling combined with hydraulic fracturing, and new surveillance techniques, have enabled commercial production from ultra-low permeability reservoirs, previously considered source or cap-rock, not reservoirs. Forecasting well production for reserves estimation, hydraulic fracture stimulation optimization, and development planning remains a challenge because of complex reservoir behavior and flow geometries associated with current wellbore architectures/stimulation treatments used to exploit tight formations. Depending on the completion design, transient flow periods can last for weeks to years, and hence traditional methods requiring boundary-dominated flow are strictly inapplicable for most of the commercial life of many wells completed in tight formations. Recently, several analytical (type-curve, flow-regime analysis and simulation) and empirical approaches have been introduced to match and forecast tight reservoir production. The challenge is to develop routine techniques that can be used to forecast tight formation production, while adequately addressing the complex physics of the problem. In this work, we build on recent attempts to combine analytical and empirical methods ("hybrid" methods) for forecasting tight/shale gas reservoirs completed with multi-fractured horizontal wells. We forecast the homogenous completion (equal hydraulic fracture length) case using established analytical procedures for transient linear flow (pre fracture interference), combined with the Arps decline curve for late-time (boundary-dominated) flow. We also examine the heterogeneous completion (unequal hydraulic fracture length) case to establish the impact of heterogeneities on decline characteristics post fracture-interference. Finally, we present an innovative method for designing hydraulic fracture and well spacing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it