Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le domaine des échanges culturels internationaux peine à se laisser étudier. Au confluent de champs disciplinaires fort variés, il semble être rétif à une observation et, par là, à une analyse panoptique. Une approche communicationnelle de la destinée de certains de ces échanges semble toutefois permettre aux chercheurs d’éviter certains écueils méthodologiques. À travers l’analyse des différents documents de communication relatifs à l’expérience à l’étranger du metteur en scène français André Antoine au tournant du 20 e siècle, on saisit le rôle moteur de l’exportation des productions théâtrales dans l’économie du spectacle vivant de l’époque et ce, tant sur les plans financier, symbolique, médiatique qu’artistique. On distingue surtout l’hétérogénéité des processus à l’œuvre lors de la mise en place de ces échanges que l’on peut catégoriser soit comme un travail de diffusion, soit comme un travail de traduction .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".