MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024583612 · doi:10.1055/s-2001-17859

Ovarian Cyst in a Premature Infant Treated with Spironolactone

2001· article· en· W2024583612 on OpenAlexaff
Akshaya Vachharajani, Jay Shah, Bosco Paes

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpironolactonehirsutismHyperandrogenismOvarian cystGynecomastiaPolycystic ovarian diseaseCystInternal medicineEndocrinologySurgeryPolycystic ovaryAldosterone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the late occurrence of an ovarian cyst in a premature infant, the second of a set of monochorionic diamnionic twins, during treatment with spironolactone. Spironolactone is commonly used in the management of neonatal chronic lung disease in combination with other diuretics because of its potassium-sparing effect. It has progestational activity and has been reported to cause gynecomastia. It is used widely for its antiandrogenic properties in the treatment of female hirsutism and hyperandrogenism and it has a role in the management of familial male-limited precocious puberty. However, the estrogenic influence induced during therapy may significantly alter the hormonal milieu in newborn females, resulting in the formation of ovarian cysts. Simple ovarian lesions <5 cm merit close ultrasonographic surveillance for resolution while larger complex masses may warrant surgical intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PerinatologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207