MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024586422 · doi:10.1021/pr049941r

Using Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography, Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry to Identify Hepatocellular Proteins with Copper-Binding Ability

2004· article· en· W2024586422 on OpenAlexaff
Scott D. Smith, Yi‐Min She, Eve A. Roberts, Bibudhendra Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCopperProteomicsCytosolMass spectrometryChromatographyAffinity chromatographyGel electrophoresisAffinity electrophoresisBiochemistryMicrosomeEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To further our knowledge of intracellular copper transport, we used a proteomics strategy to search for hepatic proteins with copper-binding ability. Hep G2 cytosolic and microsomal fractions were applied to a copper(II)-loaded immobilized metal-affinity chromatography (IMAC) column. Protein identification was performed with 2-D gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. We identified 48 cytosolic proteins and 19 microsomal proteins displaying copper-binding ability. These proteins are diverse in function. Fifty-two of the 67 proteins contain putative metal-binding domains. We have identified many components of the Hep G2 copper metalloproteome including a large number of proteins not previously known to bind copper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207