MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024609877 · doi:10.1021/ic000102q

Hydrogenolysis of a Ruthenium Carbene Complex to Yield Dihydride−Dihydrogen Tautomers:  Mechanistic Implications for Tandem ROMP−Hydrogenation Catalysis

2000· article· en· W2024609877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrogenolysisCarbeneTautomerRutheniumCatalysisROMPYield (engineering)Medicinal chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerizationMetathesisPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conversion of Grubbs's catalyst 1 into a hydrogenation catalyst is described. Hydrogenolysis of the Ru−carbene bond in CH2Cl2 yields Ru(IV) species 2; in other solvents, a mixture of 2 and its dihydrogen tautomer 4 is formed, even in the presence of base. Further reaction gives hydridochloro complex RuHCl(H2)(PCy3)2 3, which reverts to 2 in CH2Cl2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it