MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024612138 · doi:10.1080/10406630108033062

Sorption-Desorption of Pyrene for Colombia and New Mexico Soils

2001· article· en· W2024612138 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nubia E. Ramírez, Teresa J. Cutright

Bibliographic record

VenuePolycyclic aromatic compounds · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEcopetrolUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsChemistryEnvironmental chemistryDesorptionBioremediationSorptionSoil waterPyreneEnvironmental remediationBioavailabilityAdsorptionSoil contaminationContaminationSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adsorption and availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment is an important factor to be considered for potential bioremediation processes. If desorption of the organic occurs, it could imply that remediation technologies such as microbial degradation may be feasible for PAH contaminated soils. Conversely no, or partial, desorption would indicate that the components may persist in the environment due to their decreased bioavailability. The sorption-desorption of pyrene in conjunction with two different soils was studied to determine the feasibility of bioremediation as an effective treatment. The measured distribution coefficient (K d ) for the Colombia and New Mexico soils using a 4:40 soil:liquid ratio was 1956 and 526 L/kg, respectively. When the soil:liquid ratio was reduced to 1:40, the K d values were 4294 L/Kg for the Colombia, and 1141 L/Kg for the New Mexico soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolycyclic aromatic compoundsSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207