MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024618146 · doi:10.1080/01919510108962031

Co-Generation of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide by Dielectric Barrier AC Discharge in Humid Oxygen

2001· article· en· W2024618146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOzone Science and Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsTrojan Technologies (Canada)Western University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOzoneHydrogen peroxideRadicalDielectric barrier dischargeChemistryOxygenDecompositionElectrolysisHydrogenGlow dischargePhotochemistryElectrolysis of waterChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryElectrodePlasmaOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In situ ozonation by a parallel-plate dielectric barrier AC discharge through oxygen onto water surfaces (”electroozonation—) has been used to generate ozone in the gas phase and transport it across the gas-liquid interface in a single step, with simultaneous generation of hydrogen peroxide in the liquid phase. The latter may contribute to efficiency in terms of oxidative power production vs. electrical power consumption in that hydroxyl radicals are generated independently from ozone decomposition. The process is akin to glow-discharge electrolysis, in which OH radicals are produced from ionized or activated water molecules, rattier than by H2O2-induced ozone decomposition as in other advanced oxidations based upon O3/H2O2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it