Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major difficulty for anomaly detection lies in discovering boundaries between normal and anomalous behavior, due to the deficiency of abnormal samples in the training phase. In this paper, a novel coevolutionary algorithm which attempts to simulate territory establishment in ecology is conceived to tackle anomaly detection problems. Two species in normal and abnormal behavior pattern space coevolve competitively and cooperatively. Competition prevents individuals in one species from invading the other's territory; cooperation aims to achieve complete pattern coverage by adjusting the evolutionary environment according to the pressure coming from neighbors. In a sense, we extend the definition of cooperative coevolution from "coupled fitness" to "interaction of the evolutionary environment". This coevolutionary algorithm, enhanced with features like niching inside of species, global and local fitness, and fuzzy sets, tries to balance overfitting and overgeneralization. This provides an accurate boundary definition. Experimental results on transactional data from a real financial institution show that this coevolutionary algorithm is more effective than the evolutionary algorithm in evolving normal or abnormal behavior patterns only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it