Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the U.S., private investment in public equity (PIPE) is thriving. In Canada, the PIPE market also appears to be expanding rapidly, although evidence is scarce. The Canadian institutional context has generated a large pool of public stocks, with real but relatively minor financing requirements. The regulatory structure is also distinctive since private equity is viewed by policy makers and regulators as a way to obviate the financing gap affecting young growing companies. Consequently, the Canadian institutional and regulatory contexts differ from the U.S., owing to its rapid evolution and its tendency to strongly favor the emergence of vigorous PIPE activity. Our study shows that PIPEs have been more common in Canada than in the U.S. in the last decade. PIPE issuers belong predominantly to the primary sector, are small but not the smallest listed companies, and are growth-oriented companies, but not the more growth-oriented listed companies. PIPE may be a financing mode particularly well suited to the needs of small and medium-size companies, and thus deserves in-depth analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it