MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024631881 · doi:10.1063/1.1811787

Dynamical models of weak scattering

2005· article· en· W2024631881 on OpenAlex
Timothy R Field, R.J.A. Tough

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringAmplitudeScattering amplitudeStochastic differential equationPhysicsScattering theoryStochastic processRandom walkStatistical physicsDetailed balanceMathematicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend a recent diffusion model, in which the continuous time dynamics of the K-scattering process have been proposed, to include the effect of the presence of a coherent offset in the scattering amplitude. The weak scattering amplitudes are characterized in terms of continuous time biased random walk models, and the corresponding stochastic dynamics derived. The stochastic differential geometry of the resultant amplitude fluctuations is derived in relation to that of pure K-scattering. Asymptotic distributions of amplitude, intensity, and phase are provided, and the condition for detailed balance shown to hold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it