MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024644315 · doi:10.7202/019334ar

Dialogue ou « faire-semblant »?*

2008· article· fr· W2024644315 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Eileen Lohka

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers franco-canadiens de l Ouest · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se propose d’explorer jusqu’à quel point les personnages de Nancy Huston sont des étrangers du dehors, même lorsqu’ils évoluent dans leur propre pays. L’auteure campe des personnages marginaux, exclus sous leur apparence de caméléons : non seulement sont-ils souvent exclus de leur communauté, ils portent un masque même lorsqu’ils semblent participer pleinement à la vie sociale de leur milieu. Nous nous baserons sur l’interprétation d’Éric Landowski sur l’appartenance ainsi que celle de Pierre Ouellet sur la communauté, pour démontrer que le dialogue (de sourds) exacerbe l’impression de « faire-semblant » qui se dégage des romans de Nancy Huston.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers franco-canadiens de l OuestSame topicMigration and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207