MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024662650 · doi:10.4267/2042/9356

Les enjeux américains

2003· article· fr· W2024662650 on OpenAlex
Louis Favreau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHermès · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partout dans les Amériques, au Nord comme au Sud, des initiatives locales innovatrices ont pris forme. On y croise développement économique et démocratie en s’associant pour produire autrement. C’est au creux de la crise des modèles de développement que la mondialisation néolibérale s’est imposée provoquant concurrence à la hausse entre pays, exclusion et déficit démocratique. Mais la crise a aussi libéré un espace inédit pour l’action collective de transformation sociale, notamment dans la zone où le social et l’économique se superposent. L’engagement citoyen prend aujourd’hui de nouvelles figures : celle, par exemple, des Community Development Corporations (CDC) aux États-Unis et au Canada ou celle des « organisations économiques populaires » d’Amérique latine inscrites dans la co-production de services dans les bidonvilles (eau, électricité, collecte des déchets, commercialisation des produits locaux...) avec les municipalités. Voie insoupçonnée, surtout au Sud, du premier développement, le tout s’inscrivant de plus en plus dans des réseaux internationaux favorisant la multiplication des échelles d’intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it