Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partout dans les Amériques, au Nord comme au Sud, des initiatives locales innovatrices ont pris forme. On y croise développement économique et démocratie en s’associant pour produire autrement. C’est au creux de la crise des modèles de développement que la mondialisation néolibérale s’est imposée provoquant concurrence à la hausse entre pays, exclusion et déficit démocratique. Mais la crise a aussi libéré un espace inédit pour l’action collective de transformation sociale, notamment dans la zone où le social et l’économique se superposent. L’engagement citoyen prend aujourd’hui de nouvelles figures : celle, par exemple, des Community Development Corporations (CDC) aux États-Unis et au Canada ou celle des « organisations économiques populaires » d’Amérique latine inscrites dans la co-production de services dans les bidonvilles (eau, électricité, collecte des déchets, commercialisation des produits locaux...) avec les municipalités. Voie insoupçonnée, surtout au Sud, du premier développement, le tout s’inscrivant de plus en plus dans des réseaux internationaux favorisant la multiplication des échelles d’intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".