MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024666521 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2011.2181436

Blind Recursive Subspace-Based Identification of Time-Varying Wideband MIMO Channels

2011· article· en· W2024666521 on OpenAlexaff
Chao-Cheng Tu, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityInterDigital (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMIMOAlgorithmComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)WidebandSignal subspaceMIMO-OFDMSubspace topologySignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)PrecodingControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringNoise (video)MathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a blind recursive algorithm for tracking rapidly time-varying wireless channels in precoded multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. Subspace-based tracking is normally considered for slowly time-varying channels only. Due to the frequency correlation of the wireless channels, the proposed scheme can collect data not only from the time but from the frequency domain as well to speed up the update of the required second-order statistics. After each such update, the subspace information is recomputed using the orthogonal iteration, and then, a new channel estimate is obtained. We also investigate choices of precoder in terms of the tradeoff between the symbol recovery capability and the channel estimation performance and demonstrate the convergence properties of our approach. The proposed algorithm is evaluated in a Third-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Spatial Channel Model suburban macro scenario, in which a mobile station is allowed to move in any direction with a speed up to 100 km/h, corresponding to a maximum Doppler shift of about 230 Hz in this case. Numerical experiments show that the normalized mean square error of the channel estimates converges to a level of -30 dB within less than five OFDM symbols when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (per symbol) is ≥ 20 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207