MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024678057 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.4070

Les OGM et la recherche : science ou business ? Risques Toxiques et Environnementaux liés aux Plantes Transgéniques commercialisées.

2001· article· fr· W2024678057 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Séralini Gilles-Éric

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceForestryGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Présentation du sujet Sur 44 millions d’hectares à la surface de la planète, les OGM actuels sont à 99% des plantes à pesticides, après dix-sept années de recherches et six ans de multiples commercialisations. Soit ils tolèrent un désherbant, pouvant ainsi l’absorber sans mourir, tel le soja au Roundup, ou alors ils produisent un insecticide dans leurs cellules, comme le maïs Bt. Malheureusement, le tonnage d’insecticides utilisés aux Etats Unis n’a pas diminué depuis l’introduction des m...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.314
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207