MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024681991 · doi:10.1142/s0219498810003914

UNIQUELY MORPHIC RINGS

2010· article· en· W2024681991 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Tamer Koşan, Tsiu‐Kwen Lee, Yiqiang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Taiwan UniversityNational Science CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuNational Center for Theoretical Sciences
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsExistential quantificationProperty (philosophy)Ring (chemistry)Discrete mathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ring R is called left morphic if, for each a ∈ R, R/Ra ≅ l(a) or equivalently there exists b ∈ R such that Ra = l(b) and l(a) = Rb, where l(a) and l(b) denote the left annihilators of a and b in R, respectively. Motivated by recent work on left morphic rings, we study the rings R satisfying the property that for each 0 ≠ a ∈ R there exists a unique b ∈ R such that Ra = l(b) and l(a) = Rb. These rings are completely determined in this paper. We also completely determine the rings R with the property that for each 0 ≠ a ∈ R there exists a unique b ∈ R such that Ra = l(b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsSame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207