MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024684770 · doi:10.1002/jsl.42

Improved thermal stability of perfluoropolyalkylethers (PFPAEs)

2007· article· en· W2024684770 on OpenAlexaff
Jon L. Howell, Chadron M. Friesen, Alexander B. Shtarov, Joseph S. Thrasher, Alfred Waterfeld, Erik W. Pérez, Jonathan F. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Synthetic Lubrication · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Wear Analysis
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal stabilityIsopropylHexafluoropropyleneChemistryThermal decompositionMass spectrometryDegradation (telecommunications)FluorideDecompositionAmorphous solidOxideNuclear chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Polymer chemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistryInorganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract End‐group modification of poly(hexafluoropropylene oxide), a perfluoropolyalkylether (PFPAE) shows a dramatic increase in thermal stability under conditions designed to mimic a severe tribological environment. The end‐group modifications in this study include perfluoroethyl (ethyl‐F, EA‐F), n‐perfluoropropyl (n‐propyl‐F, NPA‐F), isoperfluoropropyl (isopropyl‐F, IPA‐F) and n‐perfluorohexyl (n‐hexyl‐F, NHA‐F). Amorphous aluminum fluoride (AlF3) was charged with a monodispersion of a modified PFPAE and was evaluated for thermal stability (200–270 +/− 1°C). The percent degradation of each type of end‐group has been measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and the mechanisms of decomposition have been reported. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Synthetic LubricationSame topicTribology and Wear AnalysisFrench-language works237,207