Commissural Inputs to Secondary Vestibular Neurons in Alert Cats After Canal Plugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaze is stabilized during head movements primarily by the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). After a unilateral canal plug, the VOR's response is reduced. Recovery of the VOR may be brought about by changes in the efficacy of brain stem synapses or by other mechanisms. We measured the responses of horizontal secondary vestibular neurons (HSNs) to stimulation of the contralateral labyrinth. HSN responses in normal alert cats were compared with those in cats that had recovered from unilateral horizontal semicircular canal (HSCC) plugs. After recovery, excitatory commissural inputs to HSNs on the plugged side elicited significantly smaller responses than in normal cats with no change in mean discharge rates. However, mean discharge rates tended to be higher after recovery for cells receiving inhibitory commissural inputs. The change in resting rate invalidates any direct comparison of inhibitory inputs. These results are interpreted in terms of possible mechanisms for recovery from unilateral vestibular loss by the VOR neural network. We conclude that after unilateral HSCC plugs, changes in brain stem excitatory synapses and/or excitability of secondary vestibular neurons may participate in the restoration of normal vestibular reflexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".