MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024698799 · doi:10.1021/jm700968x

Structural Diversity and Plasticity Associated with Nucleotides Targeting Orotidine Monophosphate Decarboxylase

2008· article· en· W2024698799 on OpenAlexaff
Ewa Poduch, Lianhu Wei, E.F. Pai, Lakshmi P. Kotra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNucleotideStereochemistryEnzymeBiochemistryDecarboxylationRibonucleotideActive siteGeneCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orotidine monophosphate decarboxylase (ODCase) generally accepts pyrimidine-based mononucleotides as ligands, but other nucleotides are also known to bind to this enzyme. We investigated the kinetic properties of eight common and endogenous nucleotides with ODCases from three species: Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Plasmodium falciparum, and Homo sapiens. UMP and XMP exhibited higher affinities as compared to the other nucleotides tested. The product of ODCase catalyzed decarboxylation, UMP, displayed inhibition constants (K(i)) of 330 microM against the Mt enzyme and of 210 and 220 microM against the Pf and Hs ODCases, respectively. The K(i) values for XMP were 130 microM and 43 microM, respectively, for Mt and Pf ODCases. Interestingly, XMP's affinity for human ODCase (K(i) = 0.71 microM) is comparable and even slightly better than that of the substrate OMP. Binding of various nucleotides and their structural features in the context of ODCase inhibition and inhibitor design are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207