Efficient channel assignment for cooperative sensing based on convex bipartite matching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, cooperative sensing for multi-channel cognitive radio networks (CRNs) is studied, whereby the secondary users (SUs) cooperate with each other to sense the multiple channels owned by the primary users (PUs). The objective is to better protect the primary system while satisfying the SUs' requirement on the expected access time. A general scenario is considered, where the channels present different usage characteristics and the detection performance of individual SUs varies due to the channel conditions between the PUs and SUs. With the dynamics in the channel usage characteristics and the detection capacities, each SU chooses one channel for sensing to minimize the interference to the PUs. The problem is formulated as a nonlinear integer programming problem which is NP-complete in general. To find the solution efficiently, the original problem is transformed into a variant of convex bipartite matching problem by constructing a complete bipartite graph and defining proper weight vectors. Based on the problem transformation, a channel assignment algorithm is proposed for computing in polynomial time the solution in terms of the number of SUs, the number of channels, and the maximum value of weights. Simulation results are presented to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".