MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024778847 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564855

Delay-sensitive and channel-aware scheduling in next generation wireless networks

2008· article· en· W2024778847 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Quang‐Dung Ho, Mohamed Ashour, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkQueuing delayTransmission delayNetwork packetProcessing delayScheduling (production processes)Fair queuingQueueing theoryNetwork delayWireless networkQueueEnd-to-end delayReal-time computingRound-robin schedulingDistributed computingWirelessQuality of serviceDynamic priority schedulingEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies and develops efficient traffic management techniques at the base station of future multi-service IP-based network. The proposed scheduler does not only consider the delay requirements of each traffic class in a static manner, but also the instant delay margin of each packet. This is due to the fact that the instant delay margin is significantly more meaningful than the delay requirement because it can quantify how urgent the packet is, and thus can timely and exactly determine the queuing priority that should be given to the packet. Besides, a novel queue architecture which allows the integration of delay margin based scheduling and user channel based scheduling is proposed. Queue length and packet delay survivor functions of proposed algorithms are studied by simulations in a typical wireless access network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207