Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new efficient laboratory method of preparation of chlorodimethylsilane (Cl(CH3)2SiH) has been elaborated, which is a modification of the Eaborn et al. method (34) and is based on a transsilylation reaction of substituted (amino)dimethylhydrosilanes, R2NSiMe2H (R2 = Me2, Et2, (CH2)n, etc.) with dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2). The reaction proceeds at reflux, at 70°C, preferably with an excess of Me2SiCl2. The most important feature of this novel method is a recovery of intermediate (amino)chlorodimethylsilanes (R2NSiMe2Cl), which can be again reduced to R2NSiMe2H. The transsilylation mechanism has been proven by reaction of (diethylamino)methylphenylsilane with Me2SiCl2. The products of this latter reaction are HMePhSiCl and R2NSiMe2Cl, thus a disproportionation mechanism has been excluded. New substituted bis(amino)dimethylsilanes ((R2N)2SiMe2), (amino)dimethylchlorosilanes (R2NSiMe2Cl), and (amino)dimethylhydrosilanes (R2NSiMe2H) have been synthesized and characterized by NMR and IR.Key words: chlorodimethylsilane, (CH3)2SiHCl, synthesis, new laboratory method, transsilylation mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".