MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024809385 · doi:10.1243/09576509jpe209

Experimental Investigation of the Knock and Combustion Characteristics of CH <sub>4</sub> , H <sub>2</sub> , CO, and Some of Their Mixtures

2006· article· en· W2024809385 on OpenAlexaff
H Li, G. A. Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionCompression ratioEngine knockingIgnition systemSPARK (programming language)Flammability limitExhaust gas recirculationMaterials scienceHomogeneous charge compression ignitionCylinderNuclear engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryAutomotive engineeringThermodynamicsCombustion chamberEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental data obtained in a single-cylinder, variable compression ratio, spark ignition (SI), cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine when operating on CH 4 , H 2 , CO, simulated reforming product gas (2H 2 + CO), and some of their mixtures are presented. The dependence of the value of some key operational and combustion variables, including the knock and lean operational limits, combustion duration, and exhaust emission on fuel composition, is investigated. The significant effect of the presence of H-bearing species such as CH 4 , H 2 , or H 2 O on the combustion and knock characteristics of dry CO is also highlighted. Guidelines as to the suitability of these fuels for SI engine applications are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and EnergySame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207