Dimensions of least satisfaction among protected area visitors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While a survey of 988 walk-in visitors to South Carolina's Francis Beidler Forest revealed very high levels of satisfaction as well as repeat visitation and positive referral intentions, over one-half of the respondents also provided at least one ‘disappointing’ or ‘least satisfying aspect’ of their experience in open-ended responses. Sixty per cent of these involved the natural environment and mostly focused on the lack of wildlife encountered. About one-quarter of the responses related to the management of facilities such as the boardwalk and visitor centre. Ten per cent of responses concerned the respondents themselves and mainly involved insufficient time allowed. Other response categories involved the behaviour of other visitors (e.g. noise) and external land users. The main issues raised in the open-ended responses are amenable to expedited management response, which is recommended to reduce latent dissatisfaction and avoid their transformation into major problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it