MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024829062 · doi:10.1364/ao.39.002840

Inclusion characterization in a scattering slab with time-resolved transmittance measurements: perturbation analysis

2000· article· en· W2024829062 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Morin, Sonia Verreault, Alain Mailloux, Julie Fréchette, Stéphane Châtigny, Y. Painchaud, Pierre Beaudry

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsScatteringTransmittanceSlabMaterials scienceDiffusion equationPerturbation (astronomy)Light scatteringForward scatterTime domainAttenuation coefficientPhysicsComputational physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A procedure for the time-domain optical characterization of an inclusion in a scattering slab is investigated theoretically and experimentally. The method relies on the measurement of a contrast function, which is defined as the time-dependent relative change in the transmitted signal resulting from the presence of the inclusion. Analytical expressions for the contrast functions of absorptive and diffusive inclusions are obtained through a perturbation solution of the diffusion equation. This procedure is used successfully to determine the optical properties of absorptive, diffusive, and mixed inclusions located at midplane in a scattering slab by use of time-resolved transmittance measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207