MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024866674 · doi:10.1115/icone18-29777

Fault Detection and Identification in NPP Instruments Using Kernel Principal Component Analysis

2010· article· en· W2024866674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 1 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisKernel principal component analysisFault detection and isolationIdentification (biology)Kernel (algebra)Computer scienceFault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComponent (thermodynamics)Feature extractionIsolation (microbiology)Support vector machineData miningKernel methodMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is studied for fault detection and identification in the instruments of nuclear power plants. We propose to use mean values of the sensor reconstruction errors of a KPCA model for fault isolation and identification. They provide useful information about the directions and magnitudes of detected faults, which are usually not available from other fault isolation techniques. The performance of the method is demonstrated by applications to real NPP measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it