MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024866674 · doi:10.1115/icone18-29777

Fault Detection and Identification in NPP Instruments Using Kernel Principal Component Analysis

2010· article· en· W2024866674 on OpenAlexaff
Jianping Ma, Jin Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 1 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisKernel principal component analysisFault detection and isolationIdentification (biology)Kernel (algebra)Computer scienceFault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComponent (thermodynamics)Feature extractionIsolation (microbiology)Support vector machineData miningKernel methodMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is studied for fault detection and identification in the instruments of nuclear power plants. We propose to use mean values of the sensor reconstruction errors of a KPCA model for fault isolation and identification. They provide useful information about the directions and magnitudes of detected faults, which are usually not available from other fault isolation techniques. The performance of the method is demonstrated by applications to real NPP measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 1Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207