L’apocalypse dans les représentations de l’épidémie du VIH/sida : du religieux au médiatique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les années 1980, l’épidémie du VIH/sida, à cause de sa gravité, a contribué à des représentations sociales et des interprétations dont certaines reprennent le thème de l’apocalypse. Cet article cerne cette notion dans trois ensembles de discours. Des mouvements religieux ont repris cette idée dans une perspective fondamentaliste, mais d’autres courants théologiques critiquent cet usage et proposent d’autres interprétations. Les textes philosophiques en font un emploi plus profane et hyperbolique pour signifier l’ampleur catastrophique de l’épidémie, une perspective remise aussi en question par des intellectuels critiques qui produisent des contre discours plus conformes à une vision immanente de l’infection. Les medias ont recours répétitivement à cette notion pour souligner la dimension sensationnaliste du VIH/sida, malgré les progrès pharmacologiques susceptibles d’entraîner un effacement de ce type de références.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".