MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024873173 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.085124

Self-organized topological state in a magnetic chain on the surface of a superconductor

2014· article· en· W2024873173 on OpenAlexaff
Itamar Reis, D. J. J. Marchand, Marcel Franz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMAJORANASuperconductivityTopology (electrical circuits)Surface (topology)PhysicsChain (unit)Condensed matter physicsMagnetic momentFermionPhase (matter)Phase diagramSurface statesState (computer science)Quantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic states associated with a chain of magnetic adatoms on the surface of an ordinary $s$-wave superconductor have been shown theoretically to form a one-dimensional (1D) topological phase with unpaired Majorana fermions bound to its ends. In a simple 1D effective model the system exhibits an interesting self-organization property: The pitch of the spiral formed by the adatom magnetic moments tends to adjust itself so that electronically the chain remains in the topological phase whenever such a state is physically accessible. Here we examine the physics underlying this self-organization property in the framework of a more realistic two-dimensional model of a superconducting surface coupled to a 1D chain of magnetic adatoms. Treating both the superconducting order and the magnetic moments self-consistently, we find that the system retains its self-organization property, even if the topological phase extends over a somewhat smaller portion of the phase diagram compared to the 1D model. We also study the effect of imperfections and find that, once established, the topological phase survives moderate levels of disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207