New directions in psychoneuroendocrinology: from methods to applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Society of Psychoneuroendocrinology brings together clinicians and researchers from many different fields, including, but not limited to, neuroscientists, psychiatrists, endocrinologists, immunologists, geneticists and psychologists. The continuous focus of the society is loosely based on stress and endocrine regulation, and its interdisciplinary approach has always been one of its major strengths. Attendees benefit from discussions across a wide range of disciplines. This year's meeting in Berlin, Germany, was under the theme of 'Modern Psychoneuroendocrinology: Circadian Rhythms' and focused on glucocorticoid signaling in the brain, epigenetic mechanisms of stress regulation, the neurobiology of trust and the social brain and personality and pathology. This brief article reviews selected highlights from a total of 18 keynotes, symposia and workshops presented at the conference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.042 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".