MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024885797 · doi:10.5414/cnp63202

Impact of nocturnal home hemodialysis on anemia management in patients with end-stage renal disease

2005· article· en· W2024885797 on OpenAlex
Doron Schwartz, Andreas Pierratos, Robert Richardson, S S Fenton, Christopher T. Chan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nephrology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodialysisTransferrin saturationErythropoietinAnemiaDialysisEnd stage renal diseaseFerritinHemoglobinCohortKidney diseaseInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studySurgeryIron deficiencyGastroenterologyUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: Anemia is adversely associated with poor uremia control and is an established cardiovascular risk factor in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHD) is a novel form of renal replacement therapy that offers superior clearance of uremic solutes and improvements in several cardiovascular outcome parameters. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to test the hypotheses that augmenting the dose and frequency of dialysis by NHD would improve hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and decrease requirement of erythropoietin (EPO) in ESRD patients. METHODS: In 63 patients (mean age: 46 +/- 2 years) receiving NHD (mean duration: 2.1 +/- 0.2 years), Hb, EPO dose, iron saturation, ferritin were determined before and at six monthly repeated intervals after conversion to NHD. For comparison, 32 ESRD patients (mean age: 57 +/- 3 years) who remained on self-care conventional hemodialysis (CHD) were also studied. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline Hb concentrations, iron saturation, ferritin, or EPO dose between the two cohorts. After transfer from CHD to NHD, there were significant improvements in Hb concentrations (from 115 +/- 2 to 122 +/- 3 (6 months) and 124 +/- 2 (12 months) g/l, p = 0.03) despite a fall in EPO requirement (from 10,400 +/- 1400 to 8500 +/- 1300 (6 months) and 7600 +/- 1100 (12 months) U/week, p = 0.03). In contrast, CHD cohort had no change in EPO requirement (from 8300 +/- 1100 to 8100 +/- 1300 (6 months) and 8600 +/- 1000 (12 months) U/week, p > 0.05) or Hb concentrations (from 110 +/- 2 to 115 +/- 3 (6 months) and 115 +/- 2 (12 months), p > 0.05). There was a higher percentage of ESRD patients who did not require EPO in the NHD cohort (24% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.01). Lower Hb concentrations were noted in the CHD cohort despite higher iron saturation (0.25 +/- 0.01 (NHD) vs. 0.33 +/- 0.02 (CHD), p = 0.02) at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing uremic clearance by NHD resulted in a rise in Hb and a fall in EPO requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it